Metaphysics.

[G_x0a]

Although I am new to this forum and have not contributed anything yet, it is natural for me to notice that my comments are all directed towards the field of metaphysics, I have not studied this system but it sounds cool.

Hello people interested in metaphysics, please guide me.

 

[COLGeek]

If you mean imaginary physics, or some other mystical things, this really isn't the place for that.

What specifically are you interested in?

 

[Classical Motion]

I try to stay completely away from it, but the term could have different contexts. I try to stay away from the why of things or the purpose of things, except in a dead matter context, or a mechanical physic purpose for a property or an interaction. An example would be the purpose of a neutron and it’s function in the nucleus.

When, where and why particles are here, or how made……… can not be answered.

I use an old physical model for mass and matter. Using motion that forms and powers the properties we measure about matter. And the mechanics of emission and absorption. Light/matter dynamics.

I try and stay away from any biophysics. Which involves probability, randomness and chaos.

My stage is cubic empty space, time and length pillars, and no probability, randomness and chaos is permitted.

The stage is the concept of physical reality. Maybe that could be called metaphysics.

It is much more restrictive and limited than the modern stage. Empty no property space is paramount. Another pillar. Only two forces plus an indirect one, and only two particles for the periodic table.

Another limitation.

And still explain the measurements of today. Which I attempt to do. With this stage.

But it all just hayseed supposition. A simple view.

 

[G_x0a]

If you mean imaginary physics, or some other mystical things, this really isn't the place for that.

What specifically are you interested in?

I don't have any specific concerns at the moment. I think communicating on the forum will help me shape what's next.
Good day to you.

@Classical Motion: You are repeating the answer of an AI model. Funny.

 

[Classical Motion]

Really, how bout that. I hadn't read any of those AI comments, that I am aware of.

 

[G_x0a]

Really, how bout that. I hadn't read any of those AI comments, that I am aware of.

I have seen some interesting topics and have a rough idea of the universe for myself.
The reason I suggest metaphysics is still the subject of human beings in my research, about ideas, about the ability to record the results of measurements and then not need to measure anymore (shown by setting standards for everything). This makes me think like human beings are building the universe, not trying to describe the universe, and there are many hypotheses for this story.
I find it absurd, so I have to learn more about this human being to have a clearer view, maybe metaphysics is suitable. Standards built by ideas are very difficult to achieve, or not needed.